Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 18 Jun 2002 13:12:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 18 Jun 2002 13:12:22 -0400 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:31502 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 18 Jun 2002 13:12:18 -0400 Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 18:12:19 +0100 From: Matthew Wilcox To: george anzinger Cc: "David S. Miller" , willy@debian.org, rml@mvista.com, torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Replace timer_bh with tasklet Message-ID: <20020618181219.H9435@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> References: <3D0EACCA.3290139@mvista.com> <20020617.211548.63484157.davem@redhat.com> <3D0F675F.54B87C38@mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <3D0F675F.54B87C38@mvista.com>; from george@mvista.com on Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 10:01:19AM -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 855 Lines: 22 On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 10:01:19AM -0700, george anzinger wrote: > Could you elaborate on the reason for the above bit of > code? Is it to cover some thing from the past or is this an > on going issue? I.e. will this disappear soon? Is its > usage dependent on a particular driver? The comment says: /* Deliver skb to an old protocol, which is not threaded well or which do not understand shared skbs. */ so it's nothing to do with drivers, but old protocols (like SNA, I guess). Why did you decide to use a softirq for timers rather than a tasklet? -- Revolutions do not require corporate support. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/