Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753594Ab0FWTlO (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jun 2010 15:41:14 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:46432 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752611Ab0FWTlN (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jun 2010 15:41:13 -0400 Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 12:40:46 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Tao Ma Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe , Christoph Hellwig , Mike Snitzer , stable@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: Don't count_vm_events for discard bio in submit_bio. Message-Id: <20100623124046.4dec96d1.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <1277263491-4068-1-git-send-email-tao.ma@oracle.com> References: <1277263491-4068-1-git-send-email-tao.ma@oracle.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.9; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1648 Lines: 43 On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 11:24:51 +0800 Tao Ma wrote: > In submit_bio, we count vm events by check READ/WRITE. > But actually DISCARD_NOBARRIER also has the WRITE flag set. > It looks as if in blkdev_issue_discard, we also add a > page as the payload and the bio_has_data check isn't enough. > So add another check for discard bio. > > Cc: Jens Axboe > Signed-off-by: Tao Ma > --- > block/blk-core.c | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c > index f84cce4..a725602 100644 > --- a/block/blk-core.c > +++ b/block/blk-core.c > @@ -1586,7 +1586,7 @@ void submit_bio(int rw, struct bio *bio) > * If it's a regular read/write or a barrier with data attached, > * go through the normal accounting stuff before submission. > */ > - if (bio_has_data(bio)) { > + if (bio_has_data(bio) && !(rw & BIO_RW_DISCARD)) { > if (rw & WRITE) { > count_vm_events(PGPGOUT, count); > } else { Yes, that's a buglet. Note that Christoph's "[PATCH, RFC] block: don't allocate a payload for discard request" will fix it in a better way. That patch is in linux-next now, but I expect it will be taken out again (quickly, please) because Mike has found a number of problems with it. Your patch looks like a decent temporary fix for mainline, and a permanent one for -stable. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/