Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753922Ab0FXGsA (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jun 2010 02:48:00 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:54662 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751398Ab0FXGr7 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jun 2010 02:47:59 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] irq_work From: Peter Zijlstra To: Huang Ying Cc: Ingo Molnar , "H.PeterA" <"nvin hpa"@zytor.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen In-Reply-To: <1277361791.3947.11.camel@yhuang-dev.sh.intel.com> References: <1277348698-17311-1-git-send-email-ying.huang@intel.com> <1277361352.1875.838.camel@laptop> <1277361791.3947.11.camel@yhuang-dev.sh.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 08:47:53 +0200 Message-ID: <1277362073.1875.839.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 552 Lines: 16 On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 14:43 +0800, Huang Ying wrote: > Hi, Peter, > I fact I uses exactly the similar method in my patches, just trigger it > with soft_irq instead of IRQ. Please take a look at > nmi_return_notifier_schedule in But then why still use softirq? Once you have this its completely useless. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/