Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] irq_work
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
       "H.PeterA" <"nvin hpa"@zytor.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <20100624112040.GD578@basil.fritz.box>
References: <1277363069.3947.30.camel@yhuang-dev.sh.intel.com>
	 <1277363993.1875.847.camel@laptop>
	 <1277364453.3947.64.camel@yhuang-dev.sh.intel.com>
	 <1277364727.1875.857.camel@laptop> <20100624102725.GA578@basil.fritz.box>
	 <1277375409.1875.943.camel@laptop> <20100624105254.GB578@basil.fritz.box>
	 <1277377121.1875.948.camel@laptop> <20100624110830.GC578@basil.fritz.box>
	 <1277377852.1875.950.camel@laptop>  <20100624112040.GD578@basil.fritz.box>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 13:42:11 +0200
Message-ID: <1277379731.1875.961.camel@laptop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 628
Lines: 14

On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 13:20 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Ok so going back to the original self-irq patchkit. Unfortunately the other
> reviewer hated that. How to get out of that deadlock?

Well, I didn't like your original patch either.

What's wrong with going with the patch I posted today? (aside from me
getting the barriers slightly wrong and not doing the arch
implementation).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/