Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754814Ab0FYJgB (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jun 2010 05:36:01 -0400 Received: from reaktio.net ([194.89.68.22]:35725 "EHLO ydin.reaktio.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754254Ab0FYJgA (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jun 2010 05:36:00 -0400 Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 12:36:00 +0300 From: Pasi =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?= To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: open-iscsi@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Linux IO scalability and pushing over million IOPS over software iSCSI? Message-ID: <20100625093600.GE17817@reaktio.net> References: <20100622134410.GT17817@reaktio.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20100622134410.GT17817@reaktio.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2693 Lines: 61 Hello, How about numbers using other transports? FC? Has someone done benchmarks recently? -- Pasi On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 04:44:10PM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > Hello, > > Recently Intel and Microsoft demonstrated pushing over 1.25 million IOPS using software iSCSI and a single 10 Gbit NIC: > http://communities.intel.com/community/wired/blog/2010/04/22/1-million-iops-how-about-125-million > > Earlier they achieved one (1.0) million IOPS: > http://blog.fosketts.net/2010/01/14/microsoft-intel-push-million-iscsi-iops/ > http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/server/blog/2010/01/19/1000000-iops-with-iscsi--thats-not-a-typo > > The benchmark setup explained: > http://communities.intel.com/community/wired/blog/2010/04/20/1-million-iop-article-explained > http://dlbmodigital.microsoft.com/ppt/TN-100114-JSchwartz_SMorgan_JPlawner-1032432956-FINAL.pdf > > > So the question is.. does someone have enough new hardware to try this with Linux? > Can Linux scale to over 1 million IO operations per second? > > > Intel and Microsoft used the following for the benchmark: > > - Single Windows 2008 R2 system with Intel Xeon 5600 series CPU, > single-port Intel 82599 10 Gbit NIC and MS software-iSCSI initiator > connecting to 50x iSCSI LUNs. > - IOmeter to benchmark all the 50x iSCSI LUNs concurrently. > > - 10 servers as iSCSI targets, each having 5x ramdisk LUNs, total of 50x ramdisk LUNs. > - iSCSI target server also used 10 Gbit NICs, and StarWind iSCSI target software. > - Cisco 10 Gbit switch (Nexus) connecting the servers. > > - For the 1.25 million IOPS result they used 512 bytes/IO benchmark, outstanding IOs=20. > - No jumbo frames, just the standard MTU=1500. > > They used many LUNs so they can scale the iSCSI connections to multiple CPU cores > using RSS (Receive Side Scaling) and MSI-X interrupts. > > So.. Who wants to try this? :) I don't unfortunately have 11x extra computers with 10 Gbit NICs atm to try it myself.. > > This test covers networking, block layer, and software iSCSI initiator.. > so it would be a nice to see if we find any bottlenecks from current Linux kernel. > > Comments please! > > -- Pasi > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/