Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756145Ab0FYN2P (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jun 2010 09:28:15 -0400 Received: from 80-190-117-144.ip-home.de ([80.190.117.144]:59634 "EHLO bu3sch.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755901Ab0FYN2N (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jun 2010 09:28:13 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 313 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 09:28:13 EDT Message-ID: <4C24AEE4.4090700@bu3sch.de> Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 15:28:04 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGFlbCBCw7xzY2g=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux ppc; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100515 Icedove/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joe Perches CC: "John W. Linville" , Stefano Brivio , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net, zajec5@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] b43: logging cleanups References: <20100624185339.GC2368@tuxdriver.com> <1277408432.1654.80.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> (sfid-20100624_214041_280758_2585CA6E) In-Reply-To: <1277408432.1654.80.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> (sfid-20100624_214041_280758_2585CA6E) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2181 Lines: 46 On 06/24/2010 09:40 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 14:53 -0400, John W. Linville wrote: >> On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 04:30:08PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: >>> Just some small cleanups >>> Joe Perches (3): >>> drivers/net/wireless/b43: Use local ratelimit_state >>> drivers/net/wireless/b43: Logging cleanups >>> drivers/net/wireless/b43: Rename b43_debug to b43_debugging >> Any of the b43 guys want to express an opinion on these? The cleanups, well, exchange one name for the other. I don't have a strong opinion on one or the other. So in the end I don't see why that stuff should be renamed. However, in the end I really do not care. I'm not sure why we need an additional ratelimit here. Is it a policy that every kernel driver should have local ratelimiting? If not, why do you think b43 needs its own ratelimiting? Note that b43 does not output a single line to dmesg in normal operation, after init has finished (and ratelimit is disabled in init). > Stefano, are you active here? > Your last ack for b43 was Feb 2008. > There have been 400+ commits to b43 without your ack. > > Should your name be moved from MAINTAINERS to CREDITS? > > $ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl --rolestats -f drivers/net/wireless/b43/ > Stefano Brivio (maintainer:B43 WIRELESS DRIVER) > "John W. Linville" (maintainer:NETWORKING [WIREL...,commit_signer:204/240=85%) > "Rafał Miłecki" (commit_signer:83/240=35%) > "Gábor Stefanik" (commit_signer:44/240=18%) > Michael Buesch (commit_signer:39/240=16%) > Larry Finger (commit_signer:13/240=5%) > linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org (open list:B43 WIRELESS DRIVER) > netdev@vger.kernel.org (open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS) > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list) I think these statistics are almost worthless for b43. -- Greetings Michael. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/