Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 18 Jun 2002 22:56:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 18 Jun 2002 22:56:12 -0400 Received: from chaos.physics.uiowa.edu ([128.255.34.189]:65496 "EHLO chaos.physics.uiowa.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 18 Jun 2002 22:56:11 -0400 Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 21:56:11 -0500 (CDT) From: Kai Germaschewski X-X-Sender: kai@chaos.physics.uiowa.edu To: "Adam J. Richter" cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Subject: Re: Various kbuild problems in 2.5.22 In-Reply-To: <200206190250.TAA09390@adam.yggdrasil.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1108 Lines: 30 On Tue, 18 Jun 2002, Adam J. Richter wrote: > >Well, let's say I agree that the kind of semantics change regarding > >building modules at the same time isn't the nicest. So I propose the > >following: > > >make bzImage -> compile built-in, build bzImage > >make modules -> compile modules > >make bzImage modules -> build bzImage + modules (I found a way to do so > > without having to descend twice) > > >make, > >make all -> compile vmlinux + modules as a general default, > > on i386 build bzImage + modules. > > (other archs can change the behavior as they wish) > > Great. That's fine with me. Okay. This (and some of the other small fixes, like 53c700 modversions generation) didn't make it into 2.5.23, but should be in the next release - couldn't keep up with Linus' pace ;) --Kai - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/