Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755283Ab0F1PfJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jun 2010 11:35:09 -0400 Received: from www.tglx.de ([62.245.132.106]:40352 "EHLO www.tglx.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755219Ab0F1PfG (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jun 2010 11:35:06 -0400 Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 17:33:59 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Andreas Schwab cc: Linus Torvalds , Ulrich Drepper , Darren Hart , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Danny Feng , Jakub Jelinek , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Oleg Nesterov Subject: Re: Q: sys_futex() && timespec_valid() In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <235959492.961541277496281970.JavaMail.root@zmail06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 682 Lines: 20 On Mon, 28 Jun 2010, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Linus Torvalds writes: > > > We know it's not a valid absolute timeout, since there's no way > > somebody is "waiting" for something that happened in the sixties. > > Should it reject timestamps from the seventies? No, because that's in the _VALID_ range of CLOCK_REALTIME and tv_sec is >= 0. So we are nice to the post flower power folks. Thanks, tglx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/