Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753896Ab0F1TTs (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jun 2010 15:19:48 -0400 Received: from iolanthe.rowland.org ([192.131.102.54]:40624 "HELO iolanthe.rowland.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752077Ab0F1TTr (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jun 2010 15:19:47 -0400 Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 15:19:44 -0400 (EDT) From: Alan Stern X-X-Sender: stern@iolanthe.rowland.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" cc: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Neil Brown , Matthew Garrett , mark gross <640e9920@gmail.com>, Arve =?iso-8859-1?q?Hj=F8nnev=E5g?= , Dmitry Torokhov , Florian Mickler , , Jesse Barnes Subject: Re: [update] Re: [PATCH] PM: Make it possible to avoid wakeup events from being lost In-Reply-To: <201006282101.54041.rjw@sisk.pl> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 965 Lines: 28 On Mon, 28 Jun 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Below is the patch I'd like to add to suspend-2.6/linux-next. > > Rafael > > --- > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > Subject: PM: Make it possible to avoid wakeup events from being lost > > One of the arguments during the suspend blockers discussion was that > the mainline kernel didn't contain any mechanisms making it possible > to avoid losing wakeup events during system suspend. I don't see anything more to complain about in the patch. :-) You probably should change the title and the first paragraph of the description to avoid saying that events can get lost. Like: PM: Make it possible to avoid races between wakeup and system sleep Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/