Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 19 Jun 2002 07:33:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 19 Jun 2002 07:33:34 -0400 Received: from tmr-02.dsl.thebiz.net ([216.238.38.204]:61704 "EHLO gatekeeper.tmr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 19 Jun 2002 07:33:32 -0400 Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 07:29:04 -0400 (EDT) From: Bill Davidsen To: Rusty Russell cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Question about sched_yield() In-Reply-To: <20020619045606.3566a8cc.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1070 Lines: 28 On Wed, 19 Jun 2002, Rusty Russell wrote: > On Mon, 17 Jun 2002 17:46:29 -0700 > David Schwartz wrote: > > "The sched_yield() function shall force the running thread to relinquish the > > processor until it again becomes the head of its thread list. It takes no > > arguments." > > Notice how incredibly useless this definition is. It's even defined in terms > of UP. I think you parse this differently than I, I see no reference to UP. The term "the processor" clearly (to me at least) means the processor running in that thread at the time of the yeild. The number of processors running in a single thread at any one time is an integer number in the range zero to one. -- bill davidsen CTO, TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/