Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932191Ab0F3R6a (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jun 2010 13:58:30 -0400 Received: from rcsinet10.oracle.com ([148.87.113.121]:21368 "EHLO rcsinet10.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755246Ab0F3R63 (ORCPT >); Wed, 30 Jun 2010 13:58:29 -0400 Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 13:56:37 -0400 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk To: Stefano Stabellini Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Don Dutile , Sheng Yang Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/12] PV on HVM Xen Message-ID: <20100630175637.GC16488@phenom.dumpdata.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10) X-Source-IP: acsmt355.oracle.com [141.146.40.155] X-Auth-Type: Internal IP X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090207.4C2B85B5.01CA:SCFMA4539814,ss=1,fgs=0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 749 Lines: 20 On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 05:12:20PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > Hi all, > this is another update on the PV on HVM Xen series; a list of changes > compared to the previous version follows: Can you use the [v4] in the main patch (this is the fourth version of these patches, right?)? I am getting confused as to which version I am reviewing and if I've missed one or what not. And in this first intro email state: Since v7 the following things have changed: - Konrad made some comments. - etc. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/