Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 19 Jun 2002 15:55:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 19 Jun 2002 15:55:32 -0400 Received: from mx1.elte.hu ([157.181.1.137]:5603 "HELO mx1.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 19 Jun 2002 15:55:32 -0400 Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 21:53:23 +0200 (CEST) From: Ingo Molnar Reply-To: Ingo Molnar To: Rik van Riel Cc: Dave Jones , Daniel Phillips , Craig Kulesa , , , Linus Torvalds , Subject: Re: [PATCH] (1/2) reverse mapping VM for 2.5.23 (rmap-13b) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 796 Lines: 21 On Wed, 19 Jun 2002, Rik van Riel wrote: > I am encouraged by Craig's test results, which show that > rmap did a LOT less swapin IO and rmap with page aging even > less. The fact that it did too much swapout IO means one > part of the system needs tuning but doesn't say much about > the thing as a whole. btw., isnt there a fair chance that by 'fixing' the aging+rmap code to swap out less, you'll ultimately swap in more? [because the extra swappout likely ended up freeing up RAM as well, which in turn decreases the amount of trashing.] Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/