Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 19 Jun 2002 16:22:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 19 Jun 2002 16:22:15 -0400 Received: from loke.as.arizona.edu ([128.196.209.61]:24072 "EHLO loke.as.arizona.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 19 Jun 2002 16:22:15 -0400 Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 13:21:29 -0700 (MST) From: Craig Kulesa To: Ingo Molnar cc: Rik van Riel , Dave Jones , Daniel Phillips , , , Linus Torvalds , Subject: Re: [PATCH] (1/2) reverse mapping VM for 2.5.23 (rmap-13b) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 876 Lines: 22 On Wed, 19 Jun 2002, Ingo Molnar wrote: > btw., isnt there a fair chance that by 'fixing' the aging+rmap code to > swap out less, you'll ultimately swap in more? [because the extra swappout > likely ended up freeing up RAM as well, which in turn decreases the amount > of trashing.] Agree. Heightened swapout in this rather simplified example) isn't a problem in itself, unless it really turns out to be a bottleneck in a wide variety of loads. As long as the *right* pages are being swapped and don't have to be paged right back in again. I'll try a more varied set of tests tonight, with cpu usage tabulated. -Craig - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/