Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757664Ab0GATo5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Jul 2010 15:44:57 -0400 Received: from rcsinet10.oracle.com ([148.87.113.121]:61832 "EHLO rcsinet10.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754394Ab0GATo4 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Jul 2010 15:44:56 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <1411749d-666c-447d-bf05-954e2b4adf93@default> Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 12:43:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Dan Magenheimer To: Stefano Stabellini , Konrad Wilk Cc: Fitzhardinge , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Jeremy@acsinet12.oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Don Dutile , Sheng Yang Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/12] PV on HVM Xen References: <20100630175637.GC16488@phenom.dumpdata.com alpine.DEB.2.00.1007011111510.30135@kaball-desktop> In-Reply-To: X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.2.1.2 (406224) [OL 12.0.6514.5000] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Source-IP: acsmt355.oracle.com [141.146.40.155] X-Auth-Type: Internal IP X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090203.4C2CF026.00B8:SCFMA4539814,ss=1,fgs=0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1966 Lines: 57 Hi Stefano -- What versions of Xen are compatible with this series? I.e. is 4.0 required? Are all Xen-side changes in official 4.0.0? Or only in 4.0-testing (and therefore will be in 4.0.1)? Or only in xen-unstable? If post-4.0.0 xen changes are necessary, could you point out the changesets? Thanks, Dan P.S. Sorry if I missed earlier discussion or documentation on this... but if not otherwise documented, maybe the info should be in the patch comment? > -----Original Message----- > From: Stefano Stabellini [mailto:stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 5:39 AM > To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > Cc: Fitzhardinge; xen-devel@lists.xensource.com; > Jeremy@acsinet12.oracle.com; Stefano Stabellini; linux- > kernel@vger.kernel.org; Don Dutile; Sheng Yang > Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/12] PV on HVM Xen > > On Wed, 30 Jun 2010, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 05:12:20PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > this is another update on the PV on HVM Xen series; a list of > changes > > > compared to the previous version follows: > > > > Can you use the [v4] in the main patch (this is the fourth version of > > these patches, right?)? I am getting confused as to which version I > am > > reviewing and if I've missed one or what not. > > > > And in this first intro email state: > > > > Since v7 the following things have changed: > > - Konrad made some comments. > > - etc. > > > > Good point, I'll do that from now on. > I am pretty sure that you are reviewing the latest version I sent. > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/