Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 19 Jun 2002 20:10:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 19 Jun 2002 20:10:55 -0400 Received: from gateway-1237.mvista.com ([12.44.186.158]:1008 "EHLO hermes.mvista.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 19 Jun 2002 20:10:54 -0400 Subject: Re: [patch] scheduler bits from 2.5.23-dj1 From: Robert Love To: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: Ingo Molnar , Dave Jones , Linux Kernel , James Bottomley , Linus Torvalds In-Reply-To: <20020620000751.GI22262@dualathlon.random> References: <1024530423.917.21.camel@sinai> <20020620000751.GI22262@dualathlon.random> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.7 Date: 19 Jun 2002 17:10:52 -0700 Message-Id: <1024531852.917.29.camel@sinai> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 850 Lines: 21 On Wed, 2002-06-19 at 17:07, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > obviously not. Supporting 4G cpus is enough for this century, so the > other 32bit would be just wasted space. the 1 in the shiftleft needs the > UL anyways to be correct with >32 cpus (it's not strictly a bug right > now to forget the UL but if we get it right we'll be able to go 64-way > on 64bit systems with no change other than NR_TASKS). So the bitmasks > must be all unsigned longs, the cpu numbers are definitely fine as > unsigned ints. Eh, very true. I was confusing the bitmasks and the counts. Sorry, Ingo - ignore me. Robert Love - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/