Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 19 Jun 2002 21:50:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 19 Jun 2002 21:50:57 -0400 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:39950 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 19 Jun 2002 21:50:56 -0400 Message-ID: <3D11360F.4EA4807D@zip.com.au> Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 18:55:27 -0700 From: Andrew Morton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.19-pre9 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mgross@unix-os.sc.intel.com CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List , lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, richard.a.griffiths@intel.com Subject: Re: ext3 performance bottleneck as the number of spindles gets large References: <200206200022.g5K0MKP27994@unix-os.sc.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 832 Lines: 20 mgross wrote: > > We've been doing some throughput comparisons and benchmarks of block I/O > throughput for 8KB writes as the number of SCSI addapters and drives per > adapter is increased. > > The Linux platform is a dual processor 1.2GHz PIII, 2Gig or RAM, 2U box. > Similar results have been seen with both 2.4.16 and 2.4.18 base kernel, as > well as one of those patched up O(1) 2.4.18 kernels out there. umm. Are you not using block-highmem? That is a must-have. http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/andrea/kernels/v2.4/2.4.19pre9aa2/00_block-highmem-all-18b-12.gz - - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/