Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759292Ab0GAVT2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Jul 2010 17:19:28 -0400 Received: from kroah.org ([198.145.64.141]:33207 "EHLO coco.kroah.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933134Ab0GAVPQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Jul 2010 17:15:16 -0400 X-Mailbox-Line: From gregkh@clark.site Thu Jul 1 10:43:01 2010 Message-Id: <20100701174301.645111514@clark.site> User-Agent: quilt/0.48-10.1 Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 10:44:29 -0700 From: Greg KH To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org Cc: stable-review@kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, Joerg Roedel , Avi Kivity Subject: [179/200] KVM: SVM: Fix schedule-while-atomic on nested exception handling In-Reply-To: <20100701175201.GA2149@kroah.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2598 Lines: 87 2.6.34-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Joerg Roedel Move the actual vmexit routine out of code that runs with irqs and preemption disabled. Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman (Cherry-picked from commit b8e88bc8ffba5fe53fb8d8a0a4be3bbcffeebe56) --- arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c @@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ static void svm_flush_tlb(struct kvm_vcp static void svm_complete_interrupts(struct vcpu_svm *svm); static int nested_svm_exit_handled(struct vcpu_svm *svm); +static int nested_svm_intercept(struct vcpu_svm *svm); static int nested_svm_vmexit(struct vcpu_svm *svm); static int nested_svm_check_exception(struct vcpu_svm *svm, unsigned nr, bool has_error_code, u32 error_code); @@ -1384,6 +1385,8 @@ static int nested_svm_check_permissions( static int nested_svm_check_exception(struct vcpu_svm *svm, unsigned nr, bool has_error_code, u32 error_code) { + int vmexit; + if (!is_nested(svm)) return 0; @@ -1392,7 +1395,11 @@ static int nested_svm_check_exception(st svm->vmcb->control.exit_info_1 = error_code; svm->vmcb->control.exit_info_2 = svm->vcpu.arch.cr2; - return nested_svm_exit_handled(svm); + vmexit = nested_svm_intercept(svm); + if (vmexit == NESTED_EXIT_DONE) + svm->nested.exit_required = true; + + return vmexit; } static inline int nested_svm_intr(struct vcpu_svm *svm) @@ -1521,7 +1528,7 @@ static int nested_svm_exit_special(struc /* * If this function returns true, this #vmexit was already handled */ -static int nested_svm_exit_handled(struct vcpu_svm *svm) +static int nested_svm_intercept(struct vcpu_svm *svm) { u32 exit_code = svm->vmcb->control.exit_code; int vmexit = NESTED_EXIT_HOST; @@ -1567,9 +1574,17 @@ static int nested_svm_exit_handled(struc } } - if (vmexit == NESTED_EXIT_DONE) { + return vmexit; +} + +static int nested_svm_exit_handled(struct vcpu_svm *svm) +{ + int vmexit; + + vmexit = nested_svm_intercept(svm); + + if (vmexit == NESTED_EXIT_DONE) nested_svm_vmexit(svm); - } return vmexit; } -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/