Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 20 Jun 2002 02:05:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 20 Jun 2002 02:05:26 -0400 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:24483 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 20 Jun 2002 02:05:26 -0400 Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 08:05:08 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: Andrew Morton Cc: mgross@unix-os.sc.intel.com, Linux Kernel Mailing List , lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, richard.a.griffiths@intel.com Subject: Re: ext3 performance bottleneck as the number of spindles gets large Message-ID: <20020620060508.GL812@suse.de> References: <200206200022.g5K0MKP27994@unix-os.sc.intel.com> <3D11360F.4EA4807D@zip.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3D11360F.4EA4807D@zip.com.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1030 Lines: 27 On Wed, Jun 19 2002, Andrew Morton wrote: > mgross wrote: > > > > We've been doing some throughput comparisons and benchmarks of block I/O > > throughput for 8KB writes as the number of SCSI addapters and drives per > > adapter is increased. > > > > The Linux platform is a dual processor 1.2GHz PIII, 2Gig or RAM, 2U box. > > Similar results have been seen with both 2.4.16 and 2.4.18 base kernel, as > > well as one of those patched up O(1) 2.4.18 kernels out there. > > umm. Are you not using block-highmem? That is a must-have. > > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/andrea/kernels/v2.4/2.4.19pre9aa2/00_block-highmem-all-18b-12.gz please use http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/axboe/patches/v2.4/2.4.19-pre10/block-highmem-all-19.bz2 -- Jens Axboe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/