Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755159Ab0GBHxi (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jul 2010 03:53:38 -0400 Received: from 0122700014.0.fullrate.dk ([95.166.99.235]:37153 "EHLO kernel.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752548Ab0GBHxh (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jul 2010 03:53:37 -0400 Message-ID: <4C2D9AFF.7010401@kernel.dk> Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2010 09:53:35 +0200 From: Jens Axboe MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christoph Hellwig CC: FUJITA Tomonori , James.Bottomley@suse.de, hch@lst.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] use q->prep_rq_fn for flush requests instead of q->prepare_flush_fn() References: <1278056005-25438-1-git-send-email-fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> <20100702075248.GB21266@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20100702075248.GB21266@infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 729 Lines: 20 On 2010-07-02 09:52, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 04:33:23PM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: >> We could kill q->prepare_flush_fn(). Except for ide, all the users >> just mark flush requests. They can use REQ_FLUSH flag instead. Ide can >> do like SCSI. > > Yes, and I think you should go all the way to kill it instead of > keeping both APIs around. Otherwise the patchset looks good to me. Fully agree, lets get rid of ->prepare_flush_fn(). -- Jens Axboe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/