Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758682Ab0GBOLR (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jul 2010 10:11:17 -0400 Received: from imr3.ericy.com ([198.24.6.13]:35353 "EHLO imr3.ericy.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753330Ab0GBOLQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jul 2010 10:11:16 -0400 Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 07:09:44 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck To: Jean Delvare CC: Jim Cromie , H Hartley Sweeten , Andrew Morton , Ethan Lawrence , "lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "lars4910@hotmail.com" , "birdie@permonline.ru" , "jadcock@cox.net" Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] hwmon: Add support for W83667HG-B Message-ID: <20100702140944.GA14032@ericsson.com> References: <1278021735-21188-1-git-send-email-guenter.roeck@ericsson.com> <20100702092011.0acd753f@hyperion.delvare> <20100702080704.GA12911@ericsson.com> <20100702101345.6fe9d27a@hyperion.delvare> <20100702083144.GD12911@ericsson.com> <20100702115123.18e95e14@hyperion.delvare> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100702115123.18e95e14@hyperion.delvare> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1312 Lines: 35 On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 05:51:23AM -0400, Jean Delvare wrote: > On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 01:31:44 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 04:13:45AM -0400, Jean Delvare wrote: > > > On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 01:07:04 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > > I'll also add a check for the HG-I. > > > > > > Do you have a datasheet for that one too? > > > > > No. However, since we have a tester, we will have test coverage, > > so I figured it should be worth a try. If it doesn't work > > I can still drop it from the final patch. > > FYI, I have a datasheet, which unfortunately I am not allowed to share. > Please let me know if you want me to look up something for you. > How about the changed registers ? Would give us an idea if the chip is closer to 667 or to 667-B. > > I suspect it is the same as the HG with a different chip ID. > > Beware, it's a different device number (677 vs. 667) so I would expect > more differences. > Ah, I missed that. I thought it was 667-I. Yes, you are right, that suggests more differences. Guenter > -- > Jean Delvare -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/