Message-ID: <4C2F3527.3020307@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Sat, 03 Jul 2010 21:03:35 +0800
From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
CC: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] KVM: MMU: combine guest pte read between walk
 and pte prefetch
References: <4C2C9DC0.8050607@cn.fujitsu.com> <4C2C9E6C.2040803@cn.fujitsu.com> <20100702170303.GC25969@amt.cnet> <4C2F117C.2000006@cn.fujitsu.com> <4C2F2835.5060508@redhat.com> <4C2F2A0C.90704@cn.fujitsu.com> <4C2F2C5B.9020503@redhat.com> <4C2F2DBB.50904@cn.fujitsu.com> <4C2F30BD.7050702@redhat.com> <4C2F31D9.5010104@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <4C2F31D9.5010104@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 875
Lines: 28


Avi Kivity wrote:

>>
>>
>> Well, in the description, it looked like everything was using small
>> pages (in kvm, level=1 means PTE level, we need to change this one
>> day).  Please describe again and say exactly when the guest or host
>> uses large pages.
>>
>>
> 
> Oh, I see what you mean.
> 
> Regarding the patch, is it possible just to move the check before,
> instead of adding the 'check' variable?
> 

Umm, if we move the check before the judgment, it'll check every level,
actually, only the opened mapping and the laster level need checked, so
for the performance reason, maybe it's better to keep two check-point.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/