Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755758Ab0GEAc6 (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jul 2010 20:32:58 -0400 Received: from tundra.namei.org ([65.99.196.166]:52149 "EHLO tundra.namei.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754857Ab0GEAc5 (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jul 2010 20:32:57 -0400 Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2010 10:32:19 +1000 (EST) From: James Morris To: Jiri Slaby cc: Oleg Nesterov , akpm@linux-foundation.org, adobriyan@gmail.com, nhorman@tuxdriver.com, Stephen Smalley , Eric Paris , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/12] rlimits: security, add task_struct to setrlimit In-Reply-To: <4C2DCDE8.7050905@suse.cz> Message-ID: References: <1277329933-8139-1-git-send-email-jslaby@suse.cz> <4C2DCDE8.7050905@suse.cz> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LRH 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 878 Lines: 27 On Fri, 2 Jul 2010, Jiri Slaby wrote: > On 06/24/2010 01:58 AM, James Morris wrote: > > On Wed, 23 Jun 2010, Jiri Slaby wrote: > >> Add task_struct to task_setrlimit of security_operations to be able to set > >> rlimit of task other than current. > > > > Given the scope of the changes, I'm not sure which tree these should go > > into. They affect the security API, so possibly mine. > > If there are no objections, could you take it? Or maybe Andrew, if we > persuaded him? A bunch of these patches have no acked-by or reviewed-by, which means they still need to be reviewed. - James -- James Morris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/