Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753560Ab0GENoJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jul 2010 09:44:09 -0400 Received: from helcar.apana.org.au ([209.40.204.226]:49621 "EHLO fornost.hengli.com.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751809Ab0GENoF (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jul 2010 09:44:05 -0400 Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2010 21:43:57 +0800 From: Herbert Xu To: Dan Kruchinin Cc: Steffen Klassert , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fixed division by zero bug in kernel/padata.c Message-ID: <20100705134357.GC6974@gondor.apana.org.au> References: <20100702125628.GK10072@secunet.com> <20100705131835.GN10072@secunet.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 939 Lines: 23 On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 05:35:32PM +0400, Dan Kruchinin wrote: > > > Both cases should be handled in the same way. So we could just > > stop the instance if the cpumasks do not intersect, and enable > > it as soon as they do intersect again. The padata instance would > > refuse to do anything as long as the cpumasks do not intersect, > > but it is still in a consistent state. Let me add the infrastructure > > to handle this, then you can use it with your patches. > > Ok, get it. So I should wait for another patch, right? Thanks, -- Email: Herbert Xu Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/