Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 9 Dec 2000 22:20:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 9 Dec 2000 22:20:00 -0500 Received: from home.linux3d.org ([216.86.203.152]:61713 "EHLO harlot.rb.ca.us") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 9 Dec 2000 22:19:49 -0500 Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2000 18:49:22 -0800 From: Daryll Strauss To: David Feuer Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Fwd: NTFS repair tools] Message-ID: <20001209184921.A8495@newbie> In-Reply-To: <3A3066EC.3B657570@timpanogas.org> <20001209201238.A12452@zorro.pangea.ca> <4.3.2.7.2.20001209213353.00b8bef0@postoffice.brown.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20001209213353.00b8bef0@postoffice.brown.edu>; from David_Feuer@brown.edu on Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 09:34:59PM -0500 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 09:34:59PM -0500, David Feuer wrote: > At 08:12 PM 12/9/2000 -0600, Rene wrote: > >I think part of the problem is that there are other things labeled > >DANGEROUS that actually do work fairly reliably (offhand, I'm thinking > >off the IDE config stuff..). Perhaps it needs to explicitely say > >'This is broken and is gauranteed to destroy your data. Do not use it' > > > >The 'DANGEROUS' label seems to suggest that it -may- destroy data, which > >leads to the 'it won't happen to me' mentality. > > For what it's worth, I absolutely agree with this. I have the same > impression when I just see the word "dangerous". Why not call a spade a spade and label it BROKEN. I do think that's stronger than DANGEROUS. - |Daryll - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/