Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756899Ab0GFMka (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jul 2010 08:40:30 -0400 Received: from mail-vw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.212.46]:63656 "EHLO mail-vw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755598Ab0GFMk2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jul 2010 08:40:28 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Z08UdThxnhyR9aoItFR1wo0YxoPmPIC/OjIxcJd+gom3wNNlcTvWUgB7bBpoTbxvMZ I8/+a0sWFczuhZbAuaQfKa/+YOnZ8Phspkv8V7IhwhDQrWIDnQW9l84C9qAV4mzh/O0D JxCjVSRQ6+Ya1dSU6oGAZQOlkydbfmu0S/I2Q= Message-ID: <4C33243D.1070107@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 09:40:29 -0300 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.4) Gecko/20100628 Red Hat/3.1-1.el6 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Richard Zidlicky CC: Jiri Slaby , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.34] schedule inside spin_lock_irqsave References: <20100530145240.GA21559@linux-m68k.org> <4C028336.8030704@gmail.com> <20100606124302.GA10119@linux-m68k.org> <4C0BE03C.8000709@gmail.com> <20100607130048.GA6857@linux-m68k.org> In-Reply-To: <20100607130048.GA6857@linux-m68k.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3502 Lines: 103 Em 07-06-2010 10:00, Richard Zidlicky escreveu: > On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 07:51:56PM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote: >> On 06/06/2010 02:43 PM, Richard Zidlicky wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have done a minimaly invasive patch for the stable 2.6.34 kernel and stress-tested >>> it for many hours, definitely seems to improve the behaviour. >>> >>> I have left out your beautification suggestion for now, want to do more playing with >>> other aspects of the driver. There still seem to be issues when the device is unplugged >>> while in use and such. >>> >>> --- linux-2.6.34/drivers/media/dvb/siano/smscoreapi.c.rz 2010-06-03 21:58:11.000000000 +0200 >>> +++ linux-2.6.34/drivers/media/dvb/siano/smscoreapi.c 2010-06-04 23:00:35.000000000 +0200 >>> @@ -1100,31 +1100,26 @@ >>> * >>> * @return pointer to descriptor on success, NULL on error. >>> */ >>> -struct smscore_buffer_t *smscore_getbuffer(struct smscore_device_t *coredev) >>> + >>> +struct smscore_buffer_t *get_entry(void) >>> { >>> struct smscore_buffer_t *cb = NULL; >>> unsigned long flags; >>> >>> - DEFINE_WAIT(wait); >>> - >>> spin_lock_irqsave(&coredev->bufferslock, flags); >> >> Sorry, maybe I'm just blind, but where is 'coredev' defined in this >> scope? You probably forgot to pass it to get_entry? >> >> How could this be compiled? Is there coredev defined globally? > > good catch. I think it failed and despite a different kernel id the old module was > loaded. > > Here is the new version, this time lightly tested Could you please fix the indentation and send your SOB for this patch? Cheers, Mauro. > > --- linux-2.6.34/drivers/media/dvb/siano/smscoreapi.c.rz 2010-06-03 21:58:11.000000000 +0200 > +++ linux-2.6.34/drivers/media/dvb/siano/smscoreapi.c 2010-06-07 14:32:06.000000000 +0200 > @@ -1100,31 +1100,26 @@ > * > * @return pointer to descriptor on success, NULL on error. > */ > -struct smscore_buffer_t *smscore_getbuffer(struct smscore_device_t *coredev) > + > +struct smscore_buffer_t *get_entry(struct smscore_device_t *coredev) > { > struct smscore_buffer_t *cb = NULL; > unsigned long flags; > > - DEFINE_WAIT(wait); > - > spin_lock_irqsave(&coredev->bufferslock, flags); > - > - /* This function must return a valid buffer, since the buffer list is > - * finite, we check that there is an available buffer, if not, we wait > - * until such buffer become available. > - */ > - > - prepare_to_wait(&coredev->buffer_mng_waitq, &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); > - > - if (list_empty(&coredev->buffers)) > - schedule(); > - > - finish_wait(&coredev->buffer_mng_waitq, &wait); > - > + if (!list_empty(&coredev->buffers)) { > cb = (struct smscore_buffer_t *) coredev->buffers.next; > list_del(&cb->entry); > - > + } > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&coredev->bufferslock, flags); > + return cb; > +} > + > +struct smscore_buffer_t *smscore_getbuffer(struct smscore_device_t *coredev) > +{ > + struct smscore_buffer_t *cb = NULL; > + > + wait_event(coredev->buffer_mng_waitq, (cb = get_entry(coredev))); > > return cb; > } > > > Richard > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/