Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 20 Jun 2002 12:42:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 20 Jun 2002 12:42:20 -0400 Received: from hq.fsmlabs.com ([209.155.42.197]:5131 "EHLO hq.fsmlabs.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 20 Jun 2002 12:41:55 -0400 From: Cort Dougan Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 10:30:03 -0600 To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: Linus Torvalds , Benjamin LaHaise , Rusty Russell , Robert Love , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: latest linus-2.5 BK broken Message-ID: <20020620103003.C6243@host110.fsmlabs.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from ebiederm@xmission.com on Wed, Jun 19, 2002 at 09:57:35PM -0600 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 752 Lines: 14 "Beating the SMP horse to death" does make sense for 2 processor SMP machines. When 64 processor machines become commodity (Linux is a commodity hardware OS) something will have to be done. When research groups put Linux on 1k processors - it's an experiment. I don't think they have much right to complain that Linux doesn't scale up to that level - it's not designed to. That being said, large clusters are an interesting research area but it is _not_ a failing of Linux that it doesn't scale to them. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/