Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755837Ab0GFUcQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jul 2010 16:32:16 -0400 Received: from out3.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:43536 "EHLO out3.smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753541Ab0GFUcO (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jul 2010 16:32:14 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: dc7H4YOCpJS3OF0yfajQ+ajYdGJDZyROi5yXzf0q6Pce 1278448330 Message-ID: <4C3392BE.4050009@imap.cc> Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 22:31:58 +0200 From: Tilman Schmidt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; de; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 SUSE/3.0.4-1.1.1 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Miller CC: isdn@linux-pingi.de, hjlipp@web.de, keil@b1-systems.de, i4ldeveloper@listserv.isdn4linux.de, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/11] isdn/gigaset: improve CAPI message debugging References: <20100705-patch-gigaset-05.tilman@imap.cc> <20100705.192356.52184135.davem@davemloft.net> <4C32E5FD.70103@imap.cc> <20100706.104411.235698140.davem@davemloft.net> In-Reply-To: <20100706.104411.235698140.davem@davemloft.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig7D0953E89D07A3F17E236BCC" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1805 Lines: 51 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig7D0953E89D07A3F17E236BCC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am 06.07.2010 19:44 schrieb David Miller: > From: Tilman Schmidt > Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 10:14:53 +0200 >=20 >> So if you'll postpone applying last night's series until >> after your next merge of net-2.6 into net-next-2.6, it >> should then apply cleanly. >=20 > That's the kind of information I'd like to see from you when you > post patches which have such dependencies. Understood. It's just that I had thought my "for 2.6.35" patches had already been applied to net-next-2.6, anyway. When I got your complaint I noticed I had been mistaken. Sorry for that. I know how that mistake arose, and it won't happen again. Thanks, Tilman --=20 Tilman Schmidt E-Mail: tilman@imap.cc Bonn, Germany Diese Nachricht besteht zu 100% aus wiederverwerteten Bits. Unge=F6ffnet mindestens haltbar bis: (siehe R=FCckseite) --------------enig7D0953E89D07A3F17E236BCC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkwzkscACgkQQ3+did9BuFv16wCfYs3M+itXhNeb0ojrDOenYJ3y jy4AnAzfDIO55Ml3uyjZJMRgPF2rf2aH =kzfk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig7D0953E89D07A3F17E236BCC-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/