Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755548Ab0GFXX6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jul 2010 19:23:58 -0400 Received: from bld-mail18.adl2.internode.on.net ([150.101.137.103]:36751 "EHLO mail.internode.on.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755134Ab0GFXX4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jul 2010 19:23:56 -0400 Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 09:23:51 +1000 From: Dave Chinner To: "Aneesh Kumar K. V" Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" , Neil Brown , hch@infradead.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, adilger@sun.com, corbet@lwn.net, serue@us.ibm.com, hooanon05@yahoo.co.jp, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, sfrench@us.ibm.com, philippe.deniel@CEA.FR, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH -V14 0/11] Generic name to handle and open by handle syscalls Message-ID: <20100706232351.GD25018@dastard> References: <1276621981-2774-1-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <871vbn2mk9.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20100702064108.64034561@notabene.brown> <87iq4y29a6.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20100706161002.GD7387@fieldses.org> <87eifgfsez.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87eifgfsez.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1777 Lines: 52 On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 10:39:56PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K. V wrote: > On Tue, 6 Jul 2010 12:10:02 -0400, "J. Bruce Fields" wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 02:45:45AM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K. V wrote: > > > One use case i had was that if the userspace file server can directly > > > work with the returned file system UUID, > > > > I agree that the uuid should be split out from the rest of the > > filehandle, but ... > > > > > the it can build the file > > > handle for client in a single call. > > > > ... I don't understand why both need to come in the same system call. > > Is it purely an efficiency question? If so, why do you expect this to > > be significant? > > Since we know that system wide file handle should include a file system > identifier and a file identifier my plan was to retrieve both in the > same syscall. > > > > > > (I would have thought that the system call overhead is so small, and so > > many calls will already be required to perform the typical rpc, that > > this would be insignificant.) > > > > A filesystem uuid seems like a generally useful thing (maybe more so > > than a filehandle), so it'd seem worth figuring out how to export that > > separately. > > > > I can add a new syscall that returns > > struct fs_uuid { > u8 fs_uuid[16]; > }; > > long sys_get_fs_uuid(int dfd, char *name, struct fs_uuid *fsid, int flag); libblkid already provides the UUID to userspace applications, doesn't it? Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/