Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 20 Jun 2002 13:34:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 20 Jun 2002 13:34:27 -0400 Received: from mx1.elte.hu ([157.181.1.137]:41175 "HELO mx1.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 20 Jun 2002 13:34:26 -0400 Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 19:31:18 +0200 (CEST) From: Ingo Molnar Reply-To: Ingo Molnar To: William Lee Irwin III Cc: Dave Jones , Linux Kernel , James Bottomley , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [patch] scheduler bits from 2.5.23-dj1 In-Reply-To: <20020620172059.GW22961@holomorphy.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 942 Lines: 26 On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, William Lee Irwin III wrote: > On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 01:47:29AM +0200, Dave Jones wrote: > > I'll take a look at this tomorrow, unless William "no sleep `til 2.6" Irwin > > beats me to it 8-) (he did this part of the patch iirc). > > How does this look? (compiles, boots, & runs on UP i386) looks good to me - what do you think about my other pidhash suggestion: > And i'm not quite sure whether it's needed to expose the pidhash to the > rest of the kernel - it would be much simpler to have it in > kernel/fork.c locally, and find_task_by_pid() would be a function > instead of an inline. (it has a ~49 bytes footprint on x86, it's rather > heavy i think.) Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/