Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 20 Jun 2002 13:53:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 20 Jun 2002 13:53:03 -0400 Received: from holomorphy.com ([66.224.33.161]:36799 "EHLO holomorphy") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 20 Jun 2002 13:53:02 -0400 Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 10:52:29 -0700 From: William Lee Irwin III To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Dave Jones , Linux Kernel , James Bottomley , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [patch] scheduler bits from 2.5.23-dj1 Message-ID: <20020620175229.GX22961@holomorphy.com> Mail-Followup-To: William Lee Irwin III , Ingo Molnar , Dave Jones , Linux Kernel , James Bottomley , Linus Torvalds References: <20020620172059.GW22961@holomorphy.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Description: brief message Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i Organization: The Domain of Holomorphy Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 819 Lines: 20 On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 07:31:18PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > looks good to me - what do you think about my other pidhash suggestion: >> And i'm not quite sure whether it's needed to expose the pidhash to the >> rest of the kernel - it would be much simpler to have it in >> kernel/fork.c locally, and find_task_by_pid() would be a function >> instead of an inline. (it has a ~49 bytes footprint on x86, it's rather >> heavy i think.) It's an excellent idea, I think I only forgot that was in the queue of things to write. I'll follow up with that as well. Thanks, Bill - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/