DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer
         :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=QPiGZV3YMcBxn15FrdkrmNjor71AdWEdkB4T5g/7RxJYoyLBGtLUfYyfHV4cDj0b2R
         7pOaGB1nqrAprC7CeeoMOqZ9Zh8MvsXUDHAm/H/W2aVQTC/eIudJVDKodXPedaN3xUDY
         o5Xd0ONlmq0Kxdr9F42LNdwpY1Q7Ea1M2v1VY=
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 09:41:13 +0300
From: =?UTF-8?B?VMO2csO2aw==?= Edwin <edwintorok@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
       Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.35-rc3: Load average climbing to 3+ with no apparent
 reason: CPU 98% idle, with hardly no I/O
Message-ID: <20100707094113.62f1c509@debian>
In-Reply-To: <20100706194017.a543dfb9.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
References: <20100701104022.404410d6@debian>
	<20100706194017.a543dfb9.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 2857
Lines: 71

On Tue, 6 Jul 2010 19:40:17 -0700
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

> On Thu, 1 Jul 2010 10:40:22 +0300 T__r__k Edwin
> <edwintorok@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I just noticed that my load average is 2.99 and climbing (it is 3.11
> > right now).
> > CPU is 98% idle, with hardly any I/O at all so I don't know what is
> > causing this:
> >  10:32:55 up  1:01,  5 users,  load average: 3.28, 3.31, 3.09
> > 
> > $ vmstat 5
> > procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- -system--
> > ----cpu---- r  b   swpd   free   buff  cache   si   so    bi
> > bo   in   cs us sy id wa 0  0      0 492412 490320 1716264    0
> > 0   122    79  331  419  2  1 93  4 0  0      0 492388 490320
> > 1716264    0    0     0    13  755  983  0  1 99  0 0  0      0
> > 492632 490324 1716040    0    0     1    71 1013 1455  1  1 98  0
> > 1  0      0 492132 490340 1716264    0    0     4  1651  947 1223
> > 2  1 96  1 0  0      0 491972 490340 1716272    0    0     0    69
> > 1122 1586  2  2 96  0 0  0      0 491788 490340 1716272    0
> > 0     0    41 1527 2517  3  2 95  0 0  0      0 491884 490340
> > 1716272    0    0     0   107 1419 2193  2 1 97  0
> > 
> > This happens with 2.6.35-rc3-00001-g6bdebf9 (where the -00001 patch
> > is this bugfix required for networking to work at all: "net: fix
> > deliver_no_wcard regression on loopback device")
> > 
> > I have attached the output of cfs-debug-info.sh:
> > cfs-debug-info-2010.07.01-10.29.57.gz
> > 
> > I don't see anything special in dmesg, just the continous reset of
> > ata9 (CDROM) that I reported about already:
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/6/27/83 Could this cause load average
> > calculation to go wrong?
> 

> 
> Robert thinks that your hardware might be busted.  Did you investigate
> that further?

I will do that in the weekend (swap components to see which one fails).
For now I just unplugged the CDROMs.

>  Have you rechecked earlier kernel versions to see if
> they work OK?
> 

2.6.34 showed the ATA errors too, so it is likely a HW issue
(2.6.34 never showed these errors before).

> Could be.  Run `ps aux' and see which tasks are stuck in "D" state (if
> any).  Use sysrq-W or `echo w > /proc/sysrq-trigger' (do `dmesg -n 8'
> first) to get stack traces of any stuck tasks.  Try to prevent email
> client wordwrapping when sending that info out, please.

Thanks I'll do that the next time I see this issue.
Now with the CDROMs unplugged I don't see a load of 3+ anymore
(currently 0.36 and decreasing), I'll see in the weekend if replugging
the CDROMs brings back the load issue.

Best regards,
--Edwin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/