Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 20 Jun 2002 17:36:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 20 Jun 2002 17:36:52 -0400 Received: from pcp947161pcs.cstltn01.in.comcast.net ([68.58.145.243]:24330 "EHLO mail.trelane.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 20 Jun 2002 17:36:51 -0400 Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 16:36:48 -0500 From: Andrew D Kirch To: Pradeep Padala Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ptrace vs /proc Message-Id: <20020620163648.6d5e7955.Trelane@Trelane.Net> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Trelane's Network X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.7cvs2 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1044 Lines: 23 Linux already posesses modular support for a /proc filesystem, every distribution, and I believe the stock kernel config includes support for this under the filesystems section by default. On Thu, 20 Jun 2002 17:10:43 -0400 (EDT) Pradeep Padala wrote: > Hi, > I have been trying to understand the features supported by linux ptrace > interface. In Solaris I think ptrace was replaced by /proc interface and > they claim it better. Are there any plans to do the same thing in linux? > > Thanks, > Pradeep Padala > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/