Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752907Ab0GIGKN (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jul 2010 02:10:13 -0400 Received: from kirsty.vergenet.net ([202.4.237.240]:43057 "EHLO kirsty.vergenet.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752465Ab0GIGKL (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jul 2010 02:10:11 -0400 Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 15:10:07 +0900 From: Simon Horman To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , Kenji Kaneshige , Matthew Wilcox , tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, macro@linux-mips.org, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, eike-kernel@sf-tec.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: ioremap: fix wrong physical address handling Message-ID: <20100709061007.GD20370@verge.net.au> References: <4C197A49.6020400@jp.fujitsu.com> <4C197A9E.5040509@jp.fujitsu.com> <20100617025052.GH9298@parisc-linux.org> <4C19A2EE.2010203@zytor.com> <4C19AABA.8000706@jp.fujitsu.com> <4C19BA9A.4010300@zytor.com> <4C19EC57.3000409@goop.org> <20100709042421.GB2951@verge.net.au> <4C36B494.6060801@goop.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4C36B494.6060801@goop.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1185 Lines: 27 On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 10:33:08PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > On 07/08/2010 09:24 PM, Simon Horman wrote: > >> I think it would be a pretty large change. From the Xen's perspective, > >> any machine even approximately approaching the 2^44 limit will be > >> capable of running Xen guests in hvm mode, so PV isn't really a concern. > >> > > Hi Jeremy, > > > > Is the implication of that statement that HVM is preferred where > > supported by HW? > > > > I wouldn't go that far; the PV vs HVM choice is pretty complex, and > depends on what your workload is and what hardware you have available. > All I meant was what I said: that if you're running on a machine with a > large amount of memory, then you should run your 32-bit domains as HVM > rather than PV. Though Xen could easily keep domains limited to memory > that they can actually use (it already does this, in fact). Hi Jeremy, thanks for the clarification. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/