Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756327Ab0GINSd (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jul 2010 09:18:33 -0400 Received: from proofpoint-cluster.metrocast.net ([65.175.128.136]:44887 "EHLO proofpoint-cluster.metrocast.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756248Ab0GINSb (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jul 2010 09:18:31 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/35] ivtv: use kthread_worker instead of workqueue From: Andy Walls To: Tejun Heo Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jeff@garzik.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, cl@linux-foundation.org, dhowells@redhat.com, arjan@linux.intel.com, oleg@redhat.com, axboe@kernel.dk, fweisbec@gmail.com, dwalker@codeaurora.org, stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de, florian@mickler.org, andi@firstfloor.org, mst@redhat.com, randy.dunlap@oracle.com, ivtv-devel@ivtvdriver.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <4C32D4BE.9030005@kernel.org> References: <1277759063-24607-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <1277759063-24607-3-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <1278349860.2229.9.camel@localhost> <4C32D4BE.9030005@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2010 09:15:34 -0400 Message-ID: <1278681334.3385.0.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 (2.28.3-1.fc12) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=1.12.8161:2.4.5,1.2.40,4.0.166 definitions=2010-07-09_01:2010-02-06,2010-07-09,2010-07-09 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=5.0.0-1005130000 definitions=main-1007090051 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 786 Lines: 23 On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 09:01 +0200, Tejun Heo wrote: > On 07/05/2010 07:11 PM, Andy Walls wrote: > > Assuming the new kthread_worker implementation is OK, this change for > > ivtv looks good. > > > > Reviewed-by: Andy Walls > > Acked-by: Andy Walls > > May I route this patch through wq branch? As it's not clear how this > whole patchset will end up, I think it would be better to keep things > isolated in this branch. Yes, I think that is the best way to do things. Regards, Andy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/