Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754482Ab0GIVhM (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jul 2010 17:37:12 -0400 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:34018 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753466Ab0GIVhJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jul 2010 17:37:09 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Frederic Weisbecker Subject: Re: 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 23:35:50 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.35-rc4; KDE/4.4.4; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Maciej Rutecki , Andrew Morton , Kernel Testers List , Network Development , Linux ACPI , Linux PM List , Linux SCSI List , Linux Wireless List , DRI , Al Viro , Shawn Starr , Jesse Barnes , Dave Airlie , "David S. Miller" , Patrick McHardy , Jens Axboe References: <-IGZ64uxA6G.A.P0H.bLmNMB@chimera> <20100709020440.GJ6405@nowhere> In-Reply-To: <20100709020440.GJ6405@nowhere> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201007092335.50486.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1793 Lines: 40 On Friday, July 09, 2010, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 06:34:25PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16284 > > > Subject : Hitting WARN_ON in hw_breakpoint code > > > Submitter : Paul Mackerras > > > Date : 2010-06-23 12:57 (16 days old) > > > Message-ID : <20100623125740.GA3368@brick.ozlabs.ibm.com> > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127729789113432&w=2 > > > > This has "I have a fix, will post it very soon." in the thread from > > Frederic, but I'm not seeing anything else. Frederic? > > > > Right. In fact it wasn't a regression. The per task breakpoint reservation > design was broken from the beginning and this warning has revealed the > problem. This only touched perf, and it did since perf support breakpoints. > Fortunately ptrace wasn't concerned by this problem, even not by side effects > of this. > > The fix is invasive as it's a rewrite of a (little) part of the breakpoint > reservation. And since the symptom is only a warning and also breakpoints > never released from the constraint table (just a counter, no memory leak), > the fix is headed for 2.6.36. > > It is ready in tip:/perf/core: > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip.git;a=commitdiff;h=45a73372efe4a63f44aa2e1125d4a777c2fdc8d8 > > I think this ticket can be safely closed. OK, closing. Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/