Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752577Ab0GIVoL (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jul 2010 17:44:11 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:58034 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751186Ab0GIVoI convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jul 2010 17:44:08 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 14:43:33 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.35-rc4 From: Linus Torvalds To: Xiaotian Feng Cc: Dave Airlie , Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2111 Lines: 42 On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 3:22 AM, Xiaotian Feng wrote: > > I'm facing some drm issue with -rc4, my x-windows is messed up and can > not be used. I got floods of following messages, kernel config is > attached. I have the same issue on -mmotm-rc3. It looks like the first oops that causes this problem is missing. It looks to me that the "scheduling while atomic" issue happens because you had an oops in drm_fb_release->mutex_lock_nested->oops, and then when that kills the process, we get that secondary "scheduling while atomic" thing. But I'd really like to see the first oops itself. It _looks_ like it should be a page fault with this backtrace: > [ ? 34.532219] ?[] ? drm_fb_release+0x2f/0x7e [drm] > [ ? 34.532222] ?[] ? __list_add+0x3f/0x81 > [ ? 34.532225] ?[] __mutex_lock_common+0x131/0x461 > [ ? 34.532233] ?[] ? drm_fb_release+0x2f/0x7e [drm] > [ ? 34.532239] ?[] ? drm_release+0x2bd/0x63e [drm] > [ ? 34.532242] ?[] mutex_lock_nested+0x39/0x3e > [ ? 34.532250] ?[] drm_fb_release+0x2f/0x7e [drm] > [ ? 34.532257] ?[] drm_release+0x393/0x63e [drm] > [ ? 34.532259] ?[] fput+0x135/0x1e2 > [ ? 34.532262] ?[] filp_close+0x68/0x72 > [ ? 34.532265] ?[] sys_close+0xdc/0x116 > [ ? 34.532268] ?[] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b but I'd like to see the actual register state etc from the oops too. And if it all scrolls away so quickly that you can't see it, then I suspect we need some help in the form of a bisection or something. Was 2.6.35-rc3 fine for you? If so, it should bisect pretty well - there's only a few hundred commits, so you should be able to do it in eight or nine recompiles. Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/