Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753563Ab0GKOZ3 (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jul 2010 10:25:29 -0400 Received: from out02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.232]:48607 "EHLO out02.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751683Ab0GKOZ2 (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jul 2010 10:25:28 -0400 To: Andrew Morton Cc: Linux Containers , Sukadev Bhattiprolu , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Pavel Emelyanov , Oleg Nesterov References: <20100625192945.GA25532@redhat.com> <20100625212618.GA11917@us.ibm.com> <20100625212758.GA30474@redhat.com> <20100625220713.GA31123@us.ibm.com> <20100709121425.GB18586@hawkmoon.kerlabs.com> <20100709141324.GC18586@hawkmoon.kerlabs.com> <20100711141406.GD18586@hawkmoon.kerlabs.com> From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 07:25:18 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20100711141406.GD18586@hawkmoon.kerlabs.com> (Louis Rilling's message of "Sun\, 11 Jul 2010 16\:14\:07 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-XM-SPF: eid=;;;mid=;;;hst=in01.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=67.188.4.80;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 67.188.4.80 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa04 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ;Andrew Morton X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Report: * -1.8 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 1.5 XMNoVowels Alpha-numberic number with no vowels * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG * -3.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa04 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.4 XMBrknScrpt_02 Possible Broken Spam Script * 0.0 T_TooManySym_01 4+ unique symbols in subject * 0.0 XM_SPF_Neutral SPF-Neutral * 0.4 UNTRUSTED_Relay Comes from a non-trusted relay Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/24] pidns: Remove races by stopping the caching of proc_mnt X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 25 Oct 2007 00:26:12 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in01.mta.xmission.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1529 Lines: 36 Louis Rilling writes: > On 09/07/10 8:58 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> >> Having proc reference the pid_namespace and the pid_namespace >> reference proc is a serious reference counting problem, which has >> resulted in both leaks and use after free problems. Mount already >> knows how to go from a pid_namespace to a mount of proc, so we don't >> need to cache the proc mount. >> >> To do this I introduce get_proc_mnt and replace pid_ns->proc_mnt users >> with it. Additionally I remove pid_ns_(prepare|release)_proc as they >> are now unneeded. >> >> This is slightly less efficient but it is much easier to avoid the >> races. If efficiency winds up being a problem we can revisit our data >> structures. > > IIUC, the difference between this solution and the first one I proposed is that > instead of pinning proc_mnt with mntget() at copy_process()-time, proc_mnt is > looked for and, if possible, mntget() at release_task()-time. > > Could you elaborate on the trade-off, that is accessing proc_mnt at > copy_process()-time vs looking up proc_mnt at release_task()-time? A little code simplicity. But Serge was right there is cost a noticeable cost. About 5%-7% more on lat_proc from lmbench. The real benefit was simplicity. Eric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/