Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 21 Jun 2002 09:00:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 21 Jun 2002 09:00:00 -0400 Received: from tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil ([204.222.179.33]:51352 "EHLO tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 21 Jun 2002 08:59:59 -0400 Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 07:59:15 -0500 (CDT) From: Jesse Pollard Message-Id: <200206211259.HAA26820@tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil> To: dalecki@evision-ventures.com, Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: latest linus-2.5 BK broken cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-Mailer: [XMailTool v3.1.2b] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1305 Lines: 30 Martin Dalecki : >Yes HT gives 12%. naive SMP gives 50% and good SMP (aka corssbar bus) >gives 70% for two CPU. All those numbers are well below the level >where more then 2-4 makes hardly any sense... Amdahl bites you still if you >read it like: ... I think your numbers are a little low - I've seen between 50%-80% on master/slave SMP depending on the job. 50% if both processess are heavily syscall oriented, 75% (or therabouts) when both processes are more normally balanced, and 80% if both processes are more compute bound. Good SMP, with a crossbar switch buss should give close to 95%. Good SMP alone should give about 75%. My expierence with good crossbar switch is based on Cray UNICOS/YMP/SV hardware. A well tuned hardware platform, and slightly less well tuned SMP implementation, though the UNICOS 10 rewrite may have fixed the SMP implementation. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jesse I Pollard, II Email: pollard@navo.hpc.mil Any opinions expressed are solely my own. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/