Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753479Ab0GLFxa (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jul 2010 01:53:30 -0400 Received: from mail-pv0-f174.google.com ([74.125.83.174]:51144 "EHLO mail-pv0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750968Ab0GLFx2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jul 2010 01:53:28 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=jaJzEiwx6JaMnNa2by1roTKGWduu5HGeZDOz8O2RQfZ8XR5Ir6/1bmq8okXgbFL+tI TRrjEKe+5xpVZ6hmoKhDJXIbjPbTlZVKqzM+WVD3B9s6/9jtcbBahZ/9oOa5nC/PIV4u RbQFevsCiZWfGPCqIBMhcHlNsaD4V24EUDi+U= Message-ID: <4C3AAE04.8060309@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 22:54:12 -0700 From: "Justin P. Mattock" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100615 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Giangiacomo Mariotti CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: BTRFS: Unbelievably slow with kvm/qemu References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1920 Lines: 35 On 07/11/2010 10:24 PM, Giangiacomo Mariotti wrote: > Hi, is it a known problem how much slow is Btrfs with kvm/qemu(meaning > that the image kvm/qemu uses as the hd is on a partition formatted > with Btrfs, not that the fs used by the hd inside the kvm environment > is Btrfs, in fact inside kvm the / partition is formatted with ext3)? > I haven't written down the exact numbers, because I forgot, but while > I was trying to make it work, after I noticed how much longer than > usual it was taking to just install the system, I took a look at iotop > and it was reporting a write speed of the kvm process of approximately > 3M/s, while the Btrfs kernel thread had an approximately write speed > of 7K/s! Just formatting the partitions during the debian installation > took minutes. When the actual installation of the distro started I had > to stop it, because it was taking hours! The iotop results made me > think that the problem could be Btrfs, but, to be sure that it wasn't > instead a kvm/qemu problem, I cut/pasted the same virtual hd on an > ext3 fs and started kvm with the same parameters as before. The > installation of debian inside kvm this time went smoothly and fast, > like normally it does. I've been using Btrfs for some time now and > while it has never been a speed champion(and I guess it's not supposed > to be one and I don't even really care that much about it), I've never > had any noticeable performance problem before and it has always been > quite stable. In this test case though, it seems to be doing very bad. > > cheers > not sure with butter filesystems.. but, what is the last good kernel? are you able to bisect? Justin P. Mattock -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/