Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 21 Jun 2002 13:55:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 21 Jun 2002 13:55:37 -0400 Received: from gateway-1237.mvista.com ([12.44.186.158]:41975 "EHLO hermes.mvista.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 21 Jun 2002 13:55:36 -0400 Subject: Re: latest linus-2.5 BK broken From: Robert Love To: Larry McVoy Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" , Linus Torvalds , Cort Dougan , Benjamin LaHaise , Rusty Russell , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <20020621105055.D13973@work.bitmover.com> References: <20020621105055.D13973@work.bitmover.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.7 Date: 21 Jun 2002 10:55:26 -0700 Message-Id: <1024682127.1430.39.camel@sinai> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1079 Lines: 24 On Fri, 2002-06-21 at 10:50, Larry McVoy wrote: > The real point is that multi threading screws up your kernel. All the Linux > hackers are going through the learning curve on threading and think I'm an > alarmist or a nut. After Linux works on a 64 way box, I suspect that the > majority of them will secretly admit that threading does screw up the kernel > but at that point it's far too late. Larry, this is a point you have made several times and admittedly one I agree with. I fail to see how the high-end scaling will not compromise the low-end and I am genuinely concerned Linux will become Solaris. I do not know what to do to prevent it - and I am certainly not saying we should outright prevent certain things, but it worries me. You are going to be in Ottawa next week? Maybe we can talk about it... Robert Love - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/