Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 21 Jun 2002 16:26:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 21 Jun 2002 16:26:11 -0400 Received: from [213.23.20.221] ([213.23.20.221]:20911 "EHLO starship") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 21 Jun 2002 16:26:10 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: Cort Dougan , Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: Linux, the microkernel (was Re: latest linus-2.5 BK broken) Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 22:25:22 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: Larry McVoy , "Eric W. Biederman" , Linus Torvalds , Benjamin LaHaise , Rusty Russell , Robert Love , Linux Kernel Mailing List References: <3D136BEF.3030509@mandrakesoft.com> <20020621124634.H13628@host110.fsmlabs.com> In-Reply-To: <20020621124634.H13628@host110.fsmlabs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 800 Lines: 17 On Friday 21 June 2002 20:46, Cort Dougan wrote: > I don't see Linux being in serious jeopardy in the short-term of becoming > solaris. It only aims at running on 1-4 processors and does a pretty good > job of that. Most sane people realize, as Larry points out, that the > current design will not scale to 64 processors and beyond. That's obvious, > it's not an alarmist or deep statement. The key is to realize that it's > not _meant_ to scale that high right now. And originally, it was never meant to scale to more than one processor. -- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/