Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 10 Dec 2000 04:36:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 10 Dec 2000 04:36:31 -0500 Received: from vega.services.brown.edu ([128.148.19.202]:31904 "EHLO vega.brown.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 10 Dec 2000 04:36:12 -0500 Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20001210040635.00b63340@postoffice.brown.edu> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 04:10:15 -0500 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: David Feuer Subject: Re: swapoff weird In-Reply-To: <20001210015623.V6567@cadcamlab.org> In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20001209174435.00aaf310@postoffice.brown.edu> <20001209222427.A1542@bug.ucw.cz> <4.3.2.7.2.20001209174435.00aaf310@postoffice.brown.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org At 01:56 AM 12/10/2000 -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote: >[David Feuer] > > Perhaps it would be good to put a check in unlink to make sure that > > this is not the last link to a swapfile. > >Much better to add code to /sbin/swapon and /sbin/swapoff to set and >clear immutable bit. Sure it only works on ext2 but how far do you >want to take this thing? In a private email, linux@horizon.com wrote: >No; we should add some more magic-symlink /proc entries, like >/proc//fd/ for swap files. Then they can be accessed >by swapoff even if they're deleted. Seems like a good idea to me... -- This message has been brought to you by the letter alpha and the number pi. Open Source: Think locally; act globally. David Feuer David_Feuer@brown.edu - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/