Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753158Ab0GMLL0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jul 2010 07:11:26 -0400 Received: from mail-ww0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]:57180 "EHLO mail-ww0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750830Ab0GMLLZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jul 2010 07:11:25 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=TD4W0KxI3Fb+dmIFRZiGh/jBDIgDNEieo4MF3gsFkp77uXwNHYC7FIa+pKye/sSNGg C69JuQN/+JGcUAIl34t6jq3Pce06l9v6ch7zdIHtgkC9VxfF/mhiFm84xRb5D3+5Nn9W cT3dovoojqhLxwV/PCqOBGbvPcqgIh9ZAUrHg= Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 13:11:12 +0200 From: Alejandro Riveira =?UTF-8?B?RmVybsOhbmRleg==?= To: Martin Steigerwald Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: stable? quality assurance? Message-ID: <20100713131112.26a3da54@varda> In-Reply-To: <201007111651.42963.Martin@lichtvoll.de> References: <201007110918.42120.Martin@lichtvoll.de> <201007111651.42963.Martin@lichtvoll.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA256; boundary="Sig_/55dxYQzSeG=8sgaZ4NrtUFu"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2226 Lines: 57 --Sig_/55dxYQzSeG=8sgaZ4NrtUFu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable El Sun, 11 Jul 2010 16:51:42 +0200 Martin Steigerwald escribi=C3=B3: >=20 > One reason for a demand for me is best expressed by this question: Does=20 > the kernel developer community want to encourage that a group of advanced= =20 > Linux users - but mostly non-developers - compile their own vanilla or=20 > valnilla near kernels, provide wider testing and report a bug now and=20 > then? >=20 > I can live with either answer. If not, I just will be much more reluctant= =20 > to try out new kernels. I for one stopped booting into -rc kernels. The fact that still have to patch my kernels with a *one* liner since 2.6.29 kernel [1] does not give me confidence on the "test report/bisect and it will be fixed" promise some have made in this threath =20 [1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D13362 =20 --Sig_/55dxYQzSeG=8sgaZ4NrtUFu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJMPEnQAAoJEDO4iEReSTB2BJMP/3pH5br8uG2Oqo4rWtqpOWPH ysi+Y+RU9yyeYI/ffXKWZU1A5Mt+H5a5K7W9Cv9+yavNu3tcN8iP2Xtj9VvvhO5C la/NA75RiWrM4XgQani2lJEfbWI651L8cpxvPUnUFF7S9Uh86mdS8B2XJSi3QVIS MIgEp4uS7kurHq7LAWPVQR4P6zqhzxldamn/EczvBb1lQ04kg/jIVlQ7gGZ+9Ume NjaUL/FKE1mzYGsjeTXLDm7jtcZyvD3UKJkCewBXiJFjk8LBEkQO7o+xOsCdPxsm mcROJ0oCi6BHpZNuOi1WFULa+8ZK5BoDfNaSxp3WutfubVkEttE1/gg180SBuLtP Z4zkwL7T7DdV7IXbhoImjiMbqL+y4S7Ael7DgDxVyNHNx2xPwkqEUvHpNaGaBUsH v0ngjVXx+mLgQShBBoRd/bZgQhcMkjSEixwUTsmqxOY4315egGxqeDUHlVL2dtqd PMRJI9ecFUZtbqGfgKXh2AMU1z5Z64/qzMbR5NDC1QYx2DbTSE0njJ2L2arLrttb Is5b298hNhZxaMxHXtGY83T89E7QDGkE+ZG7TeBNjdT/T2H0KMy5ff0q4Gm0zQxV WorrMt1tpEh6zHZQuZRNSWKowblncziSp+GG+VAKqOJ9S/ZZWoykGXKC1UeNKx90 x1Di15AieplcQn0cT40Q =tKaX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/55dxYQzSeG=8sgaZ4NrtUFu-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/