Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756329Ab0GNDV0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jul 2010 23:21:26 -0400 Received: from mail-wy0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:64390 "EHLO mail-wy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755516Ab0GNDVY (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jul 2010 23:21:24 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date :message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=LuasE8vS4DzGOOJRJnR6OtcdDazNHhAows3kBOOpm3DGDR0AzAlOJJ2a9u7ETAAMLr PpWaShh/cg6vdcjqNTG9K7pw9cxAP1asso/lbgJsFdjuJi3dE04PLc2CkQChLDGNJJIn XKqIKEVJ/ZhYtzfciVXpaCAb+PDKtkpbcQgmI= Subject: Re: [PATCH] tproxy: nf_tproxy_assign_sock() can handle tw sockets From: Eric Dumazet To: Felipe W Damasio Cc: Avi Kivity , David Miller , Patrick McHardy , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev In-Reply-To: References: <1278626921.2435.73.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1278695580.2696.55.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1278742649.2538.17.camel@edumazet-laptop> <4C395459.6080407@redhat.com> <1278835332.2538.51.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1279032023.2634.384.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1279036193.2634.468.camel@edumazet-laptop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 05:21:18 +0200 Message-ID: <1279077678.2444.95.camel@edumazet-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3761 Lines: 89 Le mardi 13 juillet 2010 à 17:55 -0300, Felipe W Damasio a écrit : > Hi Mr. Dumazet, > > I used the patched kernel on the production machine and squid frooze again. > > This is the dmesg message: > > > general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP > last sysfs file: /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1f.3/i2c-0/name > CPU 1 > Modules linked in: > > Pid: 5533, comm: squid Not tainted 2.6.34 #6 DX58SO/ > RIP: 0010:[] [] sock_rfree+0x26/0x37 > RSP: 0018:ffff88042287fc20 EFLAGS: 00010206 > RAX: 66c86f938964c696 RBX: ffff88034e8f9a00 RCX: 0000000000000720 > RDX: ffff8803f0ce05c0 RSI: ffff8803d441960c RDI: ffff88034e8f9a00 > RBP: ffff8803f0ee05c0 R08: ffffea000dcb9998 R09: 0000000000000000 > R10: 000000000003d830 R11: ffff8803f0ee05c0 R12: 00000000000005a8 > R13: 00000000000005a8 R14: 0000000000004378 R15: 0000000000000000 > FS: 00007f4cf33ee710(0000) GS:ffff880001840000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 > CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 > CR2: 00000000021d5fd0 CR3: 0000000422872000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 > DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 > DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 > Process squid (pid: 5533, threadinfo ffff88042287e000, task ffff88042eb61a40) > Stack: > ffffffff8136ecda ffff88034e8f9a00 ffffffff8136ea8c ffff88034e8f9a00 > <0> ffffffff813ab142 00000000000000d0 ffffffff8136f9f9 000000000eec60e2 > <0> ffff88042eb61a40 ffff88042eb61a40 ffff88042eb61a40 00000000edca7300 > Call Trace: > [] ? skb_release_head_state+0x6d/0xb7 > [] ? __kfree_skb+0x9/0x7d > [] ? tcp_recvmsg+0x6a3/0x89a > [] ? __alloc_skb+0x5e/0x14e > [] ? sock_common_recvmsg+0x30/0x45 > [] ? sock_aio_read+0xdd/0xf1 > [] ? tcp_write_xmit+0x93e/0x96c > [] ? do_sync_read+0xb0/0xf2 > [] ? vfs_read+0xb9/0xff > [] ? sys_read+0x45/0x6e > [] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b > Code: ff ff ff ff c3 48 8b 57 18 8b 87 d8 00 00 00 48 8d 8a ac 00 00 > 00 f0 29 82 ac 00 00 00 48 8b 57 18 8b 8f d8 00 00 00 48 8b 42 38 <48> > 83 b8 b0 00 00 00 00 74 06 01 8a f4 00 00 00 c3 41 57 41 89 > RIP [] sock_rfree+0x26/0x37 > RSP > ---[ end trace 22e6ca9ef825c0e6 ]--- > > > Seems to be the same issue, right? > Exactly the same. Only RAX value is different, its another chain. BTW, 0x720 is not skb->len like I said earlier, but skb->truesize, and 0x720 is OK on a 64 bit machine for a regular packet. 48 8b 57 18 mov 0x18(%rdi),%rdx skb->sk 8b 87 d8 00 00 00 mov 0xd8(%rdi),%eax skb->truesize 48 8d 8a ac 00 00 00 lea 0xac(%rdx),%rcx f0 29 82 ac 00 00 00 lock sub %eax,0xac(%rdx) 48 8b 57 18 mov 0x18(%rdi),%rdx skb->sk 8b 8f d8 00 00 00 mov 0xd8(%rdi),%ecx skb->truesize 48 8b 42 38 mov 0x38(%rdx),%rax sk->sk_prot <48> 83 b8 b0 00 00 00 00 cmpq $0x0,0xb0(%rax) 74 06 je .+6 01 8a fa 00 00 00 add %ecx,0xfa(%rdx) One thing to notice are the RDX and RBP values: RDX: ffff8803f0ce05c0 RBP: ffff8803f0ee05c0 RDX being the sk pointer (and sk+0x38 contains the corrupted "sk_prot" value) , we notice RBP contains same "sk" value + 0x200000 (2 Mbytes). (same remark on your initial bug report) Could you enable CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=y in your config ? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/