Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753575Ab0GNJWF (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jul 2010 05:22:05 -0400 Received: from mail-bw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:47835 "EHLO mail-bw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752748Ab0GNJWD convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jul 2010 05:22:03 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=IVaJePl4JHWK8BWVoLM75V51a8kempCGInRCIXLNmxorzHHxicl66me8gjCen76zpI d/oH6m0v/ZS2Wn0NrXRzz9qcS+wfaWAB3GTZX93lkw8mwdWVdm44YN8n5dv4otO28UrM sqPrtH4VOKTlSPu8Ts3UcqdzHTvlNff2mSA9g= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20100712200604.GD9897@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20100603181010.GA25779@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <1275589230.23384.19.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> <20100614083214.GA2104@pengutronix.de> <20100630104043.GG11746@pengutronix.de> <20100712155518.GA24144@pengutronix.de> <20100712173228.GC9897@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20100712200604.GD9897@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 12:21:59 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ARM defconfig files From: Felipe Contreras To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: Linus Torvalds , =?UTF-8?Q?Uwe_Kleine=2DK=C3=B6nig?= , Daniel Walker , Kevin Hilman , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Grant Likely , Eric Miao , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Nicolas Pitre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1246 Lines: 30 On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 11:06 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 10:40:36AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux >> wrote: >> > >> > When you brought up the problem you seemed absolutely convinced >> > that nothing except your solution was going to be acceptable. >> >> That's not true. What's true is that you didn't seem to _understand_ >> my solution, so I tried to push the understanding of it. > > That's your point of view. > > My viewpoint was that I had read your email, thought of some alternative > solution, proposed it and the result was shot down without any apparant > thought about it.  That gave the impression that you _only_ wanted to > see your own solution. I think you got it wrong. Linus liked my proposal of minimal defconfigs, and the only discrepancy was on the format: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/995419 -- Felipe Contreras -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/