DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        b=N6hU3ebgAD+vIiafj5vmIF9MBl6lFOEi05zMQlmG6MblEP5DeS+JJcRfjp59frpNIs
         PeZyxOMp8UCJB9ACm75bGCy9B7f0GPixZTtGrBDZfBxfwREJrpDINBoKofKXAoRJRNwp
         d5Nv+jLSzfetkI/cF+nbWBOOqObLxFKEhkZ8M=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinO32CIe0HBTXjP_bcAz0nMEw6wvcZwcob1fX3r@mail.gmail.com>
References: <cover.1279110894.git.siccegge@cs.fau.de>
	<29013fb6eab9e95e95d61df894797d2455dfa10c.1279110894.git.siccegge@cs.fau.de>
	<AANLkTinO32CIe0HBTXjP_bcAz0nMEw6wvcZwcob1fX3r@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 14:52:14 +0200
Message-ID: <AANLkTikCeDys9e1EnE9GdiJtDRcbqW3gzvsmjzvB_yDs@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] Removing dead RT2800PCI_SOC
From: Ivo Van Doorn <ivdoorn@gmail.com>
To: Christoph Egger <siccegge@cs.fau.de>
Cc: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>,
        "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
        Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>,
        Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>,
        Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com>,
        linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, users@rt2x00.serialmonkey.com,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        vamos-dev@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de,
        Luis Correia <luis.f.correia@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1221
Lines: 29

On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Luis Correia <luis.f.correia@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 13:39, Christoph Egger <siccegge@cs.fau.de> wrote:
>> While RT2800PCI_SOC exists in Kconfig, it depends on either
>> RALINK_RT288X or RALINK_RT305X which are both not available in Kconfig
>> so all Code depending on that can't ever be selected and, if there's
>> no plan to add these options, should be cleaned up
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christoph Egger <siccegge@cs.fau.de>
>
> NAK,
>
> this is not dead code, it is needed for the Ralink System-on-Chip
> Platform devices.
>
> While I can't fix Kconfig errors and the current KConfig file may be
> wrong, this code cannot and will not be deleted.

When the config option was introduced, the config options RALINK_RT288X and
RALINK_RT305X were supposed to be merged as well soon after by somebody (Felix?)

But since testing is done on SoC boards by Helmut and Felix, I assume the code
isn't dead but actually in use.

Ivo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/