Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757048Ab0GNOqs (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jul 2010 10:46:48 -0400 Received: from mail-ey0-f174.google.com ([209.85.215.174]:54432 "EHLO mail-ey0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753612Ab0GNOqr convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jul 2010 10:46:47 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=DuvHUm5PcmhDU47fTQApaHGUqqoCqVGzv6qD4KfbBhZTMKyKHW0hyH6eXUIeBnIioD O3wRsk6wmIfVuWXZ42nC8+QrlomJtnPhLpBKARcbsjDM0b5V0e87LECgNkmUaZHSSoux wj74ad0PFIzzD9OZ6GYfpLIGbx8N8FF10V5tQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20100714143625.GA30721@srcf.ucam.org> References: <4C3DCAA4.9050602@gmail.com> <20100714143625.GA30721@srcf.ucam.org> Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 15:46:46 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove 9 second reboot delay on Lenovo T400/T500 From: Pedro Ribeiro To: Matthew Garrett Cc: ibm-acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, toralf.foerster@gmx.de Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1454 Lines: 42 On 14 July 2010 15:36, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 03:33:08PM +0100, Pedro Ribeiro wrote: >> ?Please consider this patch. Let me know if you would like me to change >> ?anything or if you don't agree with it. It applies cleanly to 2.6.35-rc5. >> >> ?The Lenovo T400 and T500 have an annoying 9 second delay when >> ?rebooting, unless reboot=pci is passed to the kernel command line. >> ?This delay happens from at least kernel 2.6.20. >> >> ?Make this change permanent by hardcoding the Tx00 on the >> ?arch/kernel/reboot.c pci quirks table. > > There's two possibilities here: > > 1) Lenovo's firmware is broken and the 9-second delay is always going to > be there. In that case we should try to use the ACPI reboot vector > first. > > 2) We're doing something wrong in our shutdown sequence which then > triggers this problem as a result. > > Either way, I think this patch is wrong. > > -- > Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org > Hi Matthew, by acpi reboot vector you mean using reboot=acpi? I tried it and does not solve the problem. Check here http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127590255224570&w=2 Can you please tell me how to debug this? Thanks, Pedro -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/