Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757064Ab0GNQTg (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jul 2010 12:19:36 -0400 Received: from e35.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.153]:58825 "EHLO e35.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753947Ab0GNQTe (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jul 2010 12:19:34 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] x86: Fix vtime/file timestamp inconsistencies From: john stultz To: KOSAKI Motohiro Cc: LKML , Jiri Olsa , Thomas Gleixner , Oleg Nesterov In-Reply-To: <20100714113527.EA8A.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <1279068988-21864-1-git-send-email-johnstul@us.ibm.com> <1279068988-21864-2-git-send-email-johnstul@us.ibm.com> <20100714113527.EA8A.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 09:19:04 -0700 Message-ID: <1279124344.1831.13.camel@work-vm> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1851 Lines: 48 On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 11:40 +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > Hi > > > Due to vtime calling vgettimeofday(), its possible that an application > > could call time();create("stuff",O_RDRW); only to see the file's > > creation timestamp to be before the value returned by time. > > Just dumb question. > > Almost application are using gettimeofday() instead time(). It mean > your fix don't solve almost application. Correct, filesystem timestamps and gettimeofday can still seem inconsistently ordered. But that is expected. Because of granularity differences (one interface is only tick resolution, the other is clocksource resolution), we can't interleave the two interfaces (time and gettimeofday, respectively) and expect to get ordered results. This is why the fix I'm proposing is important: Filesystem timestamps have always been tick granular, so when vtime() was made clocksource granular (by using vgettime internally) we broke the historic expectation that the time() interface could be interleaved with filesystem operations. Side note: For full nanosecond resolution of the tick-granular timestamps, check out the clock_gettime(CLOCK_REALTIME_COARSE, ...) interface. > So, Why can't we fix vgettimeofday() vs create() inconsistency? > This is just question, I don't intend to disagree you. The only way to make gettimeofday and create consistent is to use gettimeofday clocksource resolution timestamps for files. This however would potentially cause a large performance hit, since each every file timestamp would require a possibly expensive read of the clocksource. thanks -john -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/