Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 15:44:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 15:44:00 -0400 Received: from ns3.maptuit.com ([204.138.244.3]:53266 "EHLO gear.torque.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 15:43:58 -0400 Message-ID: <3D14D301.F2C8DBBE@torque.net> Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 15:41:53 -0400 From: Douglas Gilbert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.5.24 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nick Bellinger CC: Oliver Xymoron , Patrick Mochel , sullivan , Linus Torvalds , Kurt Garloff , Linux kernel list , Linux SCSI list Subject: Re: [PATCH] /proc/scsi/map References: <1024720721.6874.104.camel@subjeKt> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3957 Lines: 86 Nick Bellinger wrote: > > On Fri, 2002-06-21 at 15:33, Oliver Xymoron wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Patrick Mochel wrote: > > > > > > But it was entierly behind me how to fit this > > > > in to the sheme other sd@4,0:h,raw > > > > OS-es are using. And finally how would one fit this in to the > > > > partitioning shemes? For the system aprtitions are simply > > > > block devices hanging off the corresponding block device. > > > > > > Partitions are purely logical entities on a physical disk. They have no > > > presence in the physical device tree. > > > > As I raised elsewhere in this thread, the distinction between physical and > > logical is troubling. Consider iSCSI, (aka SCSI-over-IP). It's analogous > > to SCSI-over-Fibre Channel, except that rather than using an embedded FC > > stack, it's using the kernel's IP stack. But it's every bit as much a SCSI > > disk/tape/whatever as a local device. Ergo, it ought to show up in the > > device tree so that it can be discovered in the same way. But where? > > > > This is only one step (the SCSI midlayer) removed from the logical devices > > created by partitioning, LVM, NBD, MD, loopback, ramdisk and the like, > > that again, ought to be discoverable in the same way as all other block > > devices. Perhaps we need root/{virtual,logical}? > > > > The interaction between iSCSI & driverfs does pose an interesting > problem: > > On one hand I tend to lead toward the view of a physical device. > The reason being that there will never be a distinction as far as the > kernel is concerned (other than driverfs of course) that a SCSI upper > level driver (hopefully soon to be a personality driver) using a iSCSI > Initiator low-level driver is not really a physical host. > > On the other hand there is the obvious fact that an iSCSI initiator > driver is not attached to a bus, and assuming /root/iSCSI.target/disk1 > etc, is out of the question. There is a real need for a solution to > handle virtual devices (as stated your previous message) that are not > assoicated with any physical connectors. > > Not being too fimilar with driverfs, what are the options with regard > to virtual devices as things currently stand without tainting the > elegant tree that is provides? iSCSI introduces some other issues. The SCSI subsystem has a 4 byte target (port) identifier at the moment. However Annex A of the SAM-2 draft ( http://www.t10.org ) indicates that it should be 258 bytes for iSCSI (and 11 bytes for ieee1394). For iSCSI the target port identifier is a WWUI plus a 2 byte target portal group tag. A WWUI looks like: com.disk-vendor.diskarrays.sn.45678 Also the SCSI subsystem has tended to hide the the initiator's own identifier (this is usually id 7 on the SCSI parallel bus). For iSCSI it may be worthwhile to make the initiator port identifier visible in driverfs. There is also the case where you want a box to appear to the network as an iSCSI target. In this case once a iSCSI login is complete you might want to represent the initiator in the driverfs tree. For iSCSI, the initiator port identifier is a WWUI plus a 6 byte "inititator session id" for a total of 262 bytes. So the "target id" we put in driverfs could have one of these suggested formats: - 0 to 1 for ATA - 0 to 15 for SCSI parallel interface - 24 bit number for fibre channel - ieee1394 - usb (mass storage + scanner) ":" - iSCSI [something better than ":"?] We should also be moving towards 8 byte luns which in one descriptor format are a 4 level hierarchy (2 bytes at each level). Doug Gilbert - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/