Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 15:50:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 15:50:13 -0400 Received: from pasmtp.tele.dk ([193.162.159.95]:1800 "EHLO pasmtp.tele.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 15:50:12 -0400 Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 21:54:53 +0200 From: Sam Ravnborg To: Roman Zippel Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: CML2 Message-ID: <20020622215453.A13719@mars.ravnborg.org> References:

Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from zippel@linux-m68k.org on Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 08:55:10PM +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 953 Lines: 23 On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 08:55:10PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote: > Anyway, not all hope is lost, I started my own configuration system some > time ago, which will be less complex than CML2. It's only advancing a bit > slowly currently, as I only have little time to work on it. Hi Roman. Despite the fact that you are advancing slowly could you explain what your plans are with the configuration system? As of today we have basically three different ways to read the Config.in files, where xconfig are the one with the best but also most critical parser/analyser. Do you plan to replace all of them or? Have you planned to let CML1 and ZCONF(or whatever you planned to call the new semantic) co-exist? Sam - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/